tto`s poll Show results | Hide results

itsaboy! (145 days ago)
i was in labor for 8 hours with my first and only 4 hours with my second

agonzales (164.6 days ago)
It wasnt shorter for me. I was in labor for 10 hours with my first and didnt need the epi. With my second I was in labor for 14 hours and that was the worst pain ever and I got the epidural. I was told oh this time will be easier and blah blah.. nope! Not for me atleast.

leahs (168.6 days ago)
My 2nd and 3rd labors were only slightly quicker than my 1st but the actual pushing was waaaay shorter than the 1st. And you do have worse uterine cramps if you bf your 2nd child.

kathleen (168.8 days ago)
i was in labour 14 hours with my 1st child, no pain relief and with my daughter i was in labour 1 hour with no pain relief. it is so much easier with your second because u no what to expect and do xx

tamnserg (169 days ago)
My second pregnancy was a tad shorter than my first. My first baby was 1wk overdue she was 7.8 my son was 3 days early and he was 8.4 My son coming out hurt more then my daughter and when/if you breastfeed with your second you will have WORSE cramps

ginger (169.2 days ago)
It was shorter and easier but still hurt just as bad! LOL



Add comments


Sign up to be able to leave comments!
(Sign up)