christinarose`s poll Show results | Hide results

heathert (116.7 days ago)
wow! I just read she had been in psychiatric care for 12 years and was out of control during labor, but should they take her new baby away? I dont know.

BethSilva (116.7 days ago)
crazy!!!

Sarah - Hopeful for 2010 baby (116.7 days ago)
Wow

loribb (116.7 days ago)
Personally I am wondering why the doctor pushing for the c-section isn`t facing repercussions. Obviously it was a major surgery that was not needed.

loribb (116.7 days ago)
http://www.huffingtonpost.com/louise-marie-roth/is-a-woman-in-labor-a-per_b_242307.html This is a link for the story.

lemonysickness (116.7 days ago)
Oh wow.

jambaby (116.8 days ago)
Some people`s religious views don`t allow them for blood transfusions and such, can they get their babies taken away, this sounds crazy, was the mother on drugs..is there more to this story..hmm

♥ ħhlЄy ▫ ßєär ®♥ (116.8 days ago)
wow..well I think it`s selfish to refuse a c-section and anytime a baby is in distress YES they are in danger. She obviously wasn`t in the best interest for her baby.

hillaryandmikesbaby (116.8 days ago)
hmm.. thats crazy.. i understand that maybe she was being irrational to not signing an emergency c-section because by not doing so i suppose they wouldnt be able to save the baby if he/she were in danger.. but.. the baby was never in danger.. so you cant say she commited a crime that never happend ya know? thats liek saying `sign this paper saying you wont kill so and so` and if you refuse you will be arrested for murder... hmm.. i wonder what will happen of this.

adriana03 (116.8 days ago)
wow. That sucks.



Add comments


Sign up to be able to leave comments!
(Sign up)