honghuzhenni (1941.8 days ago) There was a study done on it, I think you can find it if you google it. I was hoping there was some truth to it myself, since this time around I was DYING to know the gender so badly...but it shows no correlation whatsoever. And this time we are having a boy and every time he gets his heart rate checked, it`s over 140 bpm. Sorry, I wish there was a way to know early on that was accurate and not too expensive. :)
luvin Colton (1941.8 days ago) my little boy was always high 168-140 when he got bigger
jessberr31 (1941.8 days ago) Kinta! I didn`t know you were expecting again! Congrats! All my babies were around the same, in the 130/140 area, and I have 3 boys and 1 DD.
poppy~ella~rae (1941.8 days ago) there all myths things like this! my babies heart rate was very low all the way through, even the midwife when i went into labour said it sounds like there a boy in there, but i proved them all wrong with a princess! :)
kinta (1941.8 days ago) Yeah i thought my daughters was higher but i just look at her scan and it says 134bpm so i was surprised! I dont see how heartrates could be an indicator of the sex..
mommiekayla (1941.8 days ago) That was the only real difference between my 2 pregnancies..my daughter`s heartrate was about 10 bpm faster than my son`s.
kinta (1941.9 days ago) I`d just like to add that I looked at my daughters 1st ultrasound I had and her heartrate was 134bpm and with this pregnancy it`s 161bpm! so I think it`s all just stupid!