| 2ndtimemom29 | |
![]() | Age: 29 Country: USA Province/region: midwest City: Detroit Partner: husband Michael Children: Yes, 1 Pregnant: No Due date: 02 Sep ,2009 Occupation: Forensics student |
| Online: More than 3 months ago Last updated: 872 days ago. Member since: 979 days | |
| | Profile | Photos (3) | Children (1) | Blog (24) | Polls (0) | Agenda (0) | Comments added (0) | Notepad |
|
| 15-6-2009 - why do I have to wait for a C-section if the Dr. already know my baby is BREECHED? | My mood while writing this blog:mad |
Ok ladies here is the deal...I am 29 wks pregnant and have had 2 ultrasounds, and both determined that my baby is breeched. I had a C-section with my first child because she was breeched. I dont know what is going on inside my uterus, but my babies like being head first...LMAO!! Anyway my dilemma is with my crazy Dr. who is telling me that he is absolutely NOT going to take this baby early and that since my due date is 9-2 that is when I will have my surgery. I am mad because this is the same thing that happened with my daughter and I was in having so much back labor pain I couldnt even stand up from the 26th of September until the Dr's finally felt sorry for me and did the section on the 29th of September! I was hoping that I wouldnt have to go through this again with the Dr's, but I guess I am and its unfortunate because I dont understand how a damn Dr. can tell you that you are not in enough pain for him to deliever early? Did anyone else go through something like this or is now going through something like this? please leave a comment....