| gemmasmummy | |
| gemmasmummy has 248 days to go and is now in week 4 | |
![]() | Age: 27 Country: AU Province/region: NSW City: LEETON Partner: daniel Children: Yes, 1 Pregnant: Yes Due date: 22 Oct ,2012 Occupation: proud mama |
| Online: 2 days ago. Last updated: 29 days ago. Member since: 1346 days | |
| | Profile | Photos (15) | Children (1) | Blog (33) | Polls (2) | Agenda (0) | Comments added (121) | Notepad |
|
| 18-5-2009 - WTF | My mood while writing this blog:angry/diisapointed |
ok so this is kind of a rant
A town 40mins from us is holding a cutest baby competion and we decided it would be nice to enter gemma in it so i ring up where it is and find out that its $10 for the photo and entry and they donate that $10 to can assist ( a kids cancer charity) i thought that was great :)
i was getting all excited about the whole thing but forgot to ask how do ppl vote, so after a quick phone call we hear that they way the voting is worked is that u have to go into the office and pay $1 per vote and the baby with the most votes wins
we are so shocked because to put it simpler
THE PARENTS/FAMILY WHO HAVE THE MOST MONEY WIN
now how is this a cutest baby competition if the judging is voted on how much money ppl pay to vote it has nothing to do with how cute the baby is, i am so angry and very dissapointed, i already know my daughter is cute i dont have to pay $1 for every vote arrggghhh
we decided not to enter gemma in it as there is a lot of rich ppl in this town who will gladly pay thousands for there baby to win, so gemma would would have no chance, we aint rich we dont have $30 for the fuel to get there then 100s of dollars to vote
i wouldnt even have minded if the money went to kids with cancer but the voting money dosnt, it just seems to wrong to me that a cutest baby comp is based around who can make them more money
am i over reacting or does this seem messed up?
|
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||