| lindylou39 | |
| lindylou39 has 53 days to go and is now in week 32 | |
![]() | Age: 39 Country: usa Province/region: City: Minneapolis Partner: Husband Children: Yes, 1 Pregnant: Yes Due date: 09 Jul ,2008 Occupation: Legal |
| Online: 16 hours ago. Last updated: 30 days ago. Member since: 114 days | |
| | Profile | Photos (0) | Children (1) | Blog (0) | Polls (0) | Agenda (0) | Comments added (7) | Notepad |
|
More....
Hello all. My husband and I are expecting our second child. Our first was was born via unplanned c-section 6 weeks prior to my 38th birthday. This little one is due 4 weeks prior to my 40th. I am very lucky as I have very easy pregnancies - no morning sickness, bleeding scares, etc. We are very excited for our son to have a sibling as his great love is other children. I wish you all joy in this amazing journey!
1/29/08
Quad screen results came back today, all within normal limits. Different labs characterize results differently; some issue stats that reflect risk of the three issues (Down's, Trisomy 18 and Neural Tube Defects), such as "your risk is now 1:200"; others (like the lab my perinatologist uses) grade results as "normal," or "abnormal." Both characterizations are based on a complex formula that involves the mother's age, LMP, weight and medical status. If you receive a risk statistic, it is to be considered in contrast to your existing risk based on age alone and you likely don't know that exact number unless you've had genetic counseling (dad's age and family backgrounds figure into this as well, though that's not generally well-publicized). This test has both a risk of false positive and a lesser risk of false negative results. Please know most mothers (somewhere near 95%) who receive a risk factor greater than that based on age alone still go on to have chromosomally normal babies.
Next step is the Level II and this time, we are finding out the gender! (Hubby would NOT go along with that last time).
2/6/08
More evidence these risk numbers are ever-evolving and must be considered in context; my perinatologist re-presented my Quad screen results today. My risk of Downs was reduced to 1:4999, greatly reduced from the original test result of 1:149, which was still a postive number in relation to my age-alone stat of 1:104. The 1:149 number was due to inaccurate presentation by the nurse. On today's Level 2 ultrasound one "soft" Down's marker, an echogenic heart foci (small calcium deposit in the heart muscle) was detected. I was counseled by my doc that, even with my advanced age, this finding warrants no further testing and we will do none. We did have the pleasure of a privates shot so obvious we didn't need the US tech to point it out. Another boy for us! We are thrilled!
4/1/08
Had my 26 week check-up yesterday. I am measuring 5 weeks ahead - April Fools (not). I consistently measured 3 weeks ahead with my first son and was warned he'd be a big baby. He was 8 pounds on the nose, so I'm taking this latest development with a grain of salt, though I will agree to take the Gestational Diabetes test at the earliest point (28 weeks) due to my age.
4/17/08
Gestational diabetes test result came back yesterday - all normal. I just have a big belly - when you're 5' 3'', there's nowhere to go but out...